aSpeedCam Scanner ?

Bugs or suggestions to improve FoxyTag.

Moderators: Angelo, shaban, knut

aSpeedCam Scanner ?

Postby wl » Wed Oct 21, 2009 9:25 pm

Hello everybody.

I am a designer of aSpeedCam Scanner (http://aspeedcamscanner.atoll-ordenadores.com) FoxyTag client.

If you have any complains, bug-reports or ideas how to improve our application - please welcome to share them here!

We are really interested in your opinion!...
wl
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 9:17 pm

Postby Foxy » Thu Oct 22, 2009 7:53 pm

The design is nice and sophisticated. The instructions on how to tag correctly are very clear.
However, I personally do not like the slider for the Sensitivity Level. I would prefere checkboxes.
Foxy
Site Admin
 
Posts: 588
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
Location: Switzerland

Postby wl » Mon Oct 26, 2009 9:02 am

Well, matter of taste. Slider also have an advantage - it takes less space on screen then a set of checkboxes.


... We could add a possibility to display a camera orientation right on the map. But from other side, this can make the map view a bit more messy. Any opinions?...
wl
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 9:17 pm

Postby Foxy » Mon Oct 26, 2009 8:20 pm

I would use colored points:
- Red: Danger, camera in your direction.
- Green: No problem, camera in opposite direction.
- Orange: Unknown heading, so be careful.
Foxy
Site Admin
 
Posts: 588
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
Location: Switzerland

Postby wl » Tue Oct 27, 2009 9:27 am

Foxy wrote:I would use colored points:
- Red: Danger, camera in your direction.
- Green: No problem, camera in opposite direction.
- Orange: Unknown heading, so be careful.


Yes, some sort of color coding instead of direction indicator could be a solution here.
wl
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 9:17 pm


Return to Bugs and suggestions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron